Disgusting Lawyers in Hong Kong

鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月 !  點解會有事務律師唔找或者遲找大律師嘅費用咁低能？會俾香港律師會釘牌嗰喎！ Not paying Counsel's Fees or being late in paying Barristers is a serious act of misconduct punishable by suspension from practice! December 2012 - Disciplinary Decisions - Tang Ming Fai, Joseph (the Respondent) • Principles 6.04, 12.04 and 12.05 of the Hong Kong Solicitors’ Guide to Professional Conduct Volume 1 (“the Guide”) http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/tang-ming-fai-joseph-respondent

蕭震然大律師死得！ Hong Kong Barrister Devin Sio Will Probably Go To Jail!  https://www.hk01.com/ 突發 /671606/ 扮空置屋戶主挪佔業權呃逾 6 千萬 -12 人被捕包括大律師蕭震然夫婦 警方偵破一宗串謀詐騙案， 12 人涉嫌佯稱為空置單位戶主，挪佔業權後透過抵押申請貸款或出售，騙取 6000 多萬元，涉案 8 單位包括一個市建局重建計劃單位。據了解，被捕人包括執業大律師蕭震然與妻子，執業律師衛珮璇及林欣芳。

陳家昇大律師失德行為罪成 Barrister Chan Ka Sing Convicted of Misconduct  On 12 November 2018, two Complaints were lodged with the Convenor of the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal (“the BDT”) against Mr. Chan Ka Sing (“Mr. Chan”) concerning his conduct when he was instructed to represent a defendant in High Court Criminal Case No. 145 of 2014 (“the Criminal Case”). The Complaints are, in summary, as follows: (i) Complaint 1: Mr. Chan failed his duty as a practising barrister to be competent in all his professional activities when representing the defendant in the Criminal Case in mitigation. (ii) Complaint 2: Mr. Chan took instructions from the defendant prior to the hearing of the Criminal Case without the presence of the person instructing him or his representatives. Hong Kong Lawyer Counsel Barrister Mr Chan Ka Sing ( 陳家昇大律師 ) admitted to the Complaints in the BDT proceedings.  By a Statement of Findings dated 24 January 2019, the BDT found Mr. Chan guilty of the two Complaints, and ord...

支聯會鄒幸彤大律師應該要被永久釘牌 ! Harcourt Chambers Barrister Chow Hang Tung Should be Struck Off! https://www.hk01.com/ 社會新聞 /674945/ 支聯會 7 人被控違反港區國安法 - 鄒幸彤與 4 常委保釋全被拒 警方國安處昨引《港區國安法》起訴 7 名支聯會相關人士，並分兩案提控，其中該會的主席李卓人   、副主席何俊仁、鄒幸彤，被指涉煽惑他人以非法手段，推翻中國根本制度或中央政權，遭控以煽動顛覆國家政權罪；鄒與另 4 名常委，則被控未有遵從《國安法實施細則》發出的通知， 7 名被告分兩案今日（ 10 日）在西九龍裁判法院提堂。法庭先處理涉及何俊仁等人的案件，暫定於 10 月 28 日再提訊；至於涉及 5 名常委的案件，控方原要求押後兩周被裁判官羅德泉拒絕， 5 人全部否認控罪，案件押後至下月 21 日作審前覆核，羅官拒絕所有被告保釋，全部還柙懲教署看管。 李卓人等 3 人涉煽動顛覆國家政權 首宗涉及 4 名被告：支聯會、支聯會主席李卓人（ 64 歲，工會幹事）   、副主席何俊仁（ 69 歲，律師）及鄒幸彤（ 36 歲，律師）。他們被控於 2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 8 日，在香港煽動他人組織、策劃、實施或者參與實施以非法手段，旨在顛覆國家政權的行為，即推翻、破壞中華人民共和國根本制度，或推翻中華人民共和國中央政權。 支聯會 7 董事全羈押無法委派律師 法庭先處理首宗案件，控方表示案中首被告，即支聯會未有代表出席今日聆訊，同為案中被告的鄒幸彤解釋，由於組織 7 名董事均在羈押當中，無法開會授權委派律師。控方亦表示明白案件較倉促，同意要先讓組織索取指示委派律師，羅官遂詢問鄒押後一個月是否足夠，鄒稱雖然開會可能出現「實際困難」，但同意先押後一個月，雙方經進一步討論後，決定將案件押後至 10 月 28 日。

Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189 https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T 36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct.